Now that those of you in my INFS 1000 course have read the Brian Martin article, and have talked a bit about scholarly research, what do you think about this report? Add your comments to the blog, or post in our discussion forums in D2L. Other classes are welcome to comment on this as well, not just INFS 1000 folks.
Peer review highly sensitive to poor refereeing, claim researchers - physicsworld.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment